UK Autumn Budget: Neither as Good nor as Bad as It Might Have Been
The UK Autumn Budget has finally been delivered and, as many expected, it offers limited relief while signalling tighter spending power for consumers—particularly when it comes to discretionary purchases.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves
© Reuters
Reactions from the business and retail sectors have been mixed. Analysts warn that the package lacks bold measures to stimulate growth and carries risks that could weigh on both consumers and retailers.
One notable omission was the return of tax-free shopping—a measure widely supported by retailers, luxury brands, and tourism bodies. Despite strong evidence of its benefits for the UK economy, both the previous Conservative government and the current Labour administration continue to resist reinstating it.
The Budget did confirm the scrapping of Low Value Import (de minimis) rules, which many argue give a competitive edge to overseas platforms like Shein. However, delaying this change until 2029 has frustrated many British retailers who feel the playing field remains uneven.
Although the Office for Budget Responsibility expects inflation to keep falling, Reeves introduced several measures aimed at boosting household finances. Pensioners will see a 4.8% State Pension increase next April. The minimum wage will rise 4.1%, with younger workers receiving an 8.5% boost. The unpopular two-child benefit cap is being abolished, rail fares frozen, and the Eco energy scheme scrapped—cutting around £150 from average energy bills.
These initiatives should, in theory, leave consumers with more disposable income. However, the continued freeze on income tax thresholds for another three years means many workers will still face higher tax bills as wage growth pushes them into higher bands.
Higher-income households will also feel the impact of new measures, including a “mansion tax” on properties valued above £2 million, electric vehicle mileage taxes, and a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice pension contributions—all reducing discretionary spending power.
For businesses, especially retailers, the Budget signals rising operational costs. The minimum wage increase will directly impact labour expenses, the main allowance rate in corporation tax is being reduced, and firms investing in electric vehicle delivery fleets will face new charges.
The government did promise permanently lower business tax rates for more than 750,000 retail, leisure, and hospitality properties. However, this will be offset by higher rates for properties valued at over £500,000—a category that includes many warehouses used by online retail giants.
OneStream Software warned that the changes could cost the sector more than £400 million annually, forcing retailers to rethink margins, store estates, and investment plans.
Silvia Rindone, EY UK&I Retail Lead, noted that the tiered business rates offer welcome relief for smaller retailers at a time when margins remain tight. However, she cautioned that the increased cost burden on larger operators could ultimately translate into higher prices for consumers—weakening high street resilience.
Rindone also warned that closing the de minimis loophole could have unintended consequences: “It could push up online prices, forcing consumers to rethink buying habits,” she said. Premium retailers may also see their core customers’ spending power eroded.
She added that retailers must adapt quickly: “Value-driven propositions and omnichannel strategies will be crucial in an environment where affordability and trust shape purchasing decisions.”
Jan Schneiderbanger, partner at L.E.K. Consulting, agreed the Budget felt underwhelming for a sector facing fragile consumer sentiment and challenging trading conditions. Last year’s increases in employer National Insurance and the National Living Wage already weighed heavily on large retailers, he said.
While the new banded business-rates system may offer long-term clarity and relief for smaller high-street retailers, the higher rate multipliers will add pressure to big supermarkets, distribution centres, and prime central London locations—where costs are already substantial.
