Luxury e-tail crisis: Is it game over for sector’s biggest names?

blog image

The well-known high-end clothing retailer Matches has lately experienced massive layoffs, affecting 273 employees—nearly half of the workforce. Teneo, an insolvency specialist, is trying to find a buyer for the company as it goes through administration. The three London stores and headquarters of Matches employ 533 people, and the company serves customers in 170 countries.

Many merchants selling high-end apparel have followed Benji Dymant’s lead and seen a sharp drop in demand over the previous year. One of the many reasons for this drop is the difficult macroeconomic climate, which is caused by rising inflation and interest rates and has been widely reported to put pressure on discretionary expenditure.

Luxury e-tail crisis


The previous owner, Frasers Group, had hinted at Matches’ worsening position, requiring significant investment to turn around, when they bought the company for £52 million. The administrators are currently assessing their options in light of the continuing sale talks, thus the likelihood of a pre-pack administration arrangement is low.

The difficulties encountered by Matches are indicative of more systemic problems in the high-end fashion e-commerce industry, which was formerly believed to be a rapidly expanding market led by UK merchants. But recent occurrences have highlighted major challenges that industry participants are facing.

Farfetch – DR


In the past, the sector had reason to be optimistic with the 2015 merger of Yoox and Net-A-Porter, and in 2018, Richemont bought YNAP, a sign of confidence in the sector’s future. Much like Farfetch’s successful offering in 2018 and Apax Partners’ 2017 acquisition of Matches, hopes of continuing growth were spurred by these events.

To begin with, when the epidemic was in full swing, online shopping was the way to go, especially for high-end items. But then there have been these huge problems, including falling demand and changes in customer behavior.



The shifting tastes of aspirational consumers and the growing importance of direct-to-consumer channels by brands over more conventional wholesale partnerships are two of the reasons cited by analysts as causes of these difficulties. The necessity for cost control and strategic adaption is highlighted by the impact on premium markets like Matches.

In addition, operations have been impacted by logistical challenges and customer service concerns, especially for high-end online retailers aiming to match the personalized experiences provided by physical storefronts. Online stores are under pressure to innovate and improve their omnichannel offers in response to the rise of brick-and-mortar stores.


In addition, e-commerce platforms have faced additional difficulties due to logistical setbacks and strained relationships with brands, which emphasizes the importance of strong alliances and efficient operations.

The current instability experienced by market heavyweights such as Farfetch and Matches highlights how fragile the luxury e-commerce scene is, in contrast to early hopes and lofty expansion forecasts. The future of the industry is unclear while players reevaluate their plans and deal with persistent uncertainties.

James Anderson

James, an esteemed fashion critic and beauty enthusiast, covers all the dazzling moments of fashion week while keeping readers up-to-date on the latest beauty trends sweeping the industry.

Read more